Monday, August 21, 2006

Snakes on a Plane

The star of this movie is, of course, Samuel L Jackson, not Laurence Fishburn. Chalk my brain up for the same thing that made me call James Marsters "Marsden" and Serenity, Serendipity. Disorganised, see? (I do actually have an IQ. I just fail to use it most days).

Of course, that's now two otherwise great actors with career-ending movies, but that's another story.

Advertising this movie on TV now. Like, it's something to be proud of with the CGI snakes that look like they were created in the 80s and cut and pasted into the film using 90s technology. Sheesh.

I just don't know what they were thinking. Imagine the pitch.

"Great idea for a film. Anaconda meets Executive Decision."

Because we all know how well those movies did.

Line:

Samuel L to unknown fellow on phone in urgent and ominous voice: "You know all of those safety scenarios we ran? Well, here's one we didn't think of."

Uh-huh. Because who's going to actually think that a bazillion snakes are going to storm a plane?

"Hey, Bob, let's run this scenario, just in case."

"Jim, are you actually insane?"

"Bob, I have a very strong feeling it's going to be needed."

"Gods alive. Here we go with the 'I'm psychic' bullcrap again. Honestly, Jim..."

Guess Bob is laughing on the other side of his face now, huh.

Holy frijoles.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Tuesday Night Hoax: Mars Huge 'Round About Nowish

So.

I have received several different versions of the "Mars is going to be as big as the moon this month" email recently. Like some others, I get a bit annoyed at receiving emails that are proponents of this or that (sometimes with large picture files attached that eat up my broadband MB allowance or clog up the dial-up user's downloading of their emails), especially ones that are obvious hoaxes.

Especially when it is so easy to check the sources before sending them on, on sites such as snopes.com (a site I will be checking all emails with, along with another reliable source if I can find one).

I'm not talking about funnies here (whether accurate or not - the Washington Post Mensa Competition falls under this one), or emails of the "crazy cats dance" persuasion, but the "Coke will melt a tooth overnight" types of emails that are designed to alarm, lovely "my angel protected me stories" designed as morality tales to convert you to [insert religion here], or emails that deliberately misinform.

So, Tuesday night is now "post a hoax" night.

I am going to start with the aforementioned Mars email.

The email states:

The Red Planet is about to be spectacular!

This month and next, Earth is catching up with Mars in an encounter that will culminate in the closest approach between the two planets in recorded history. The next time Mars may come this close is in 2287. Due to the way Jupiter's gravity tugs on Mars and perturbs its orbit, astronomers can only be certain that Mars has not come this close to Earth in the Last 5,000 years, but it may be as long as 60,000 years before it happens again.

The encounter will culminate on August 27th 2006 when Mars comes to within 34,649,589 miles of Earth and will be (next to the moon) the brightest object in the night sky. It will attain a magnitude of -2.9 and will appear 25.11 arc seconds wide.


And so on.

Snopes says:

Origins: The piece quoted above is another example of an item that was once true but is now being circulated again, long after the events it describes have come to pass. This article was relevant back in 2003, but it is not applicable now, three years later."

Further information on this email can be found on the NASA site:

July 7, 2005: Just when you thought it was safe to read your email....

There's a rumor about Mars going around the internet. Here are some snippets from a widely-circulated email message:

"The Red Planet is about to be spectacular."

"Earth is catching up with Mars [for] the closest approach between the two planets in recorded history."

"On August 27th … Mars will look as large as the full moon."

And finally, "NO ONE ALIVE TODAY WILL EVER SEE THIS AGAIN."

Only the first sentence is true. The Red Planet is about to be spectacular. The rest is a hoax.

Here are the facts: Earth and Mars are converging for a close encounter this year [2005] on October 30th at 0319 Universal Time. Distance: 69 million kilometers. To the unaided eye, Mars will look like a bright red star, a pinprick of light, certainly not as wide as the full Moon.

Disappointed? Don't be. If Mars did come close enough to rival the Moon, its gravity would alter Earth's orbit and raise terrible tides.

Sixty-nine million km is good. At that distance, Mars shines brighter than anything else in the sky except the Sun, the Moon and Venus. The visual magnitude of Mars on Oct. 30, 2005, will be -2.3. Even inattentive sky watchers will notice it, rising at sundown and soaring overhead at midnight.

You might remember another encounter with Mars, about two years ago, on August 27, 2003. That was the closest in recorded history, by a whisker, and millions of people watched as the distance between Mars and Earth shrunk to 56 million km. This October's encounter, at 69 million km, is similar. To casual observers, Mars will seem about as bright and beautiful in 2005 as it was in 2003.

Although closest approach is still months away, Mars is already conspicuous in the early morning. Before the sun comes up, it's the brightest object in the eastern sky, really eye-catching. If you have a telescope, even a small one, point it at Mars. You can see the bright icy South Polar Cap and strange dark markings on the planet's surface.


For the record, I did check out Mars last October, and it was very pretty. So please stop telling me about it. And, anyone who missed it in August 2003, don't be too upset. There'll be another of similar magnitude in about 13 years or so.

Do you have a consistent hoax email that is giving you the irrates by popping into your inbox every 5 minutes? Comment and I'll use it next Tuesday.

Thanks to snopes.com and NASA for keeping us informed.

It should be noted that some of the emails that bounce around the internet are true, but not very many. If I don't find an irritating hoax email, I'll report on one that is, in fact, the truth as far as can be ascertained.

In Other Important News

Both the Saints and the Eels are fourth on their respective ladders.

All is good with the world.

Monday, August 14, 2006

The weekend

This weekend, I had a busy one.

Friday night was spent in a marathon session trying to decide who would get into the 2007 Clarion South Writer's workshop. We were very pleased with the number and standard of entries this year, but it did make decisions very, very difficult. Saturday morning, we spent time allocating funding. I will post a list once the successful, and more importantly, the unsuccessful applicants have been informed and confirmed.

Saturday night, I took my older boys (teenagers both) to see Miami Vice. I think I shall say, for the record, that I am not a huge Colin Farrel fan. I am a fan of the original series (but not so much that I've bought the DVDs unlike, say, the A-Team). This movie didn't have a start, so to speak, (no opening credits), which was fine in itself but meant for the first half-hour, I was slightly distracted becuase I kept waiting for them. That past, though, it ended up being a fairly mediocre movie with not too much wrong but not too much right, either. Certainly, it was more gritty than the series ever was, which I guess was the point, but some of the comeraderie aspect was missing between the two main characters as a result.

The cinematography style became tiring after a while.

All in all, not a complete waste of time, but I would have preferred to watch The Lake House for a second time.

Had a moment of true amusement during the credits though. A new movie, coming soooon!... ta-da Snakes on a Plane. And it's not a farce. It's a serious movie. Oh. My. Great. Aunt. Laura. What were The Powers That Be thinking when they gave the go-ahead for this? And not as a "made specially only for DVD movie", at that? A definite career-ender for Laurence Fishburn (like the third Matrix wasn't, but that's another post). This movie will be right up there with Attack of the Killer Tomatoes -- without the funny.

Sunday I went to see my mum and her hubby up on the Sunshine Coast with said teenagers. That was great, because I haven't seen them for about 6 months due to varying flus, etc.

So, busy.

Book update: I haven't written anything specifically for the book's text, as yet, however, I have spent a lot of time printing out and re-organising everything that I had done so far so I could do the required homework tasks and get everythign clear in my head once more. And there is a lot of it. I didn't realise how much, even after I'd amalgamated some files. I did about a million words before I even started, I think. Good news is, I found some plot point ideas I'd forgotten about - and they may even work.

I also spent some time doing some reading and note-taking for Project # 2.

Last week was a bit of a write-off, time-wise, though. Tuesday I spent the day at #3's sports - he represented his school trying out for the districts so I was the mum doing some driving back and forth for that. Wednesday I had the preschool excursion; Thursday a meeting and an excursion for #3's class.

This week I should have more time, despite the public holiday on Wednesday (and therefore all kids home) and the pupil-free on Thursday (and therefore... you get the drift).

Today, I have no kids because the ex's public holiday is today not Wednesday so he has the day off and therefore the youngest for the day. And #1 son has work experience. So, unexpected writing time, so I shall go and do that now. As soon as I've done the vacuuming. And I should phone Nicky. :-)

Then I'll write.

Monday, August 07, 2006

So, what's been happening?

That is both a rhetorical question and a literal one. As in, literally, I would love to hear how things have been going for everyone who reads here (feel free to post comments), and rhetorically, because it's a title for the post of "what's been happening here" with me, thanks to those who've asked.

Let's see. Nothing terribly exciting with me in particular, but my kids are doing well.

I've had the flu, again, of course, and Conjure, the NatCon here in Brisbane at Easter, went very well. In fact, I think the worst complaint that came back to me was "too well organised". I can live with that. Certainly, the crew that worked on the convention happen to be a group that work particularly well together, even with any personality quirks and complaints, etc., we work it out and get on with it. Good bunch.

120 hours of stuff in 10 days in the time leading up to the con, though. I look back on it and go, "how??" Also didn't have a lot of time at the con itself, to catch up with friends, etc. In fact, apart from dinner on Friday (thanks Gillian!) and a sit-down on Saturday night when I was feeling harrassed anyways so wasn't great company (sorry Keith), I literally didn't stop until the masqu. on Sunday night, and even then, only after the belly dancers left. Then it was back to it on Monday *grin* This is not a complaint, of course, that's the way it is and I didn't mind.

So, most of the time, the only chance I had to talk to anyone was if they were volunteering with me or I was doing something for them, so sorry to anyone I didn't have a chance to talk to. Poor Sean had an awful neck that weekend; he was full of apologies but I don't think he had anything to apologise for!

Kate, Rob, Rob and I also managed to win a Ditmar Award for "Best Professional Achievement" for Clarion South 2005. That was nice. Thanks to all who voted. :-)

Which brings me to Clarion South... January 2007. Applications closed at the end of June, of course, so I've been busy (I'm apps director, for anyone who doesn't know). The good news for anyone who's waiting is that we should have our decisions made by next week, so expect an announcement from me soonish, depending on how quickly the successful applicants get back to us (we have them confirm before publicising the list).

My mum's hubby hadn't been well, either, but is much better now, thank goodness.

My eldest son will turn 16 in September and has left school. He is doing a worklink programme instead (combination of yr 10/TAFE/work experiance and job education) and is happy with that. #6 turns 5 on Friday! #5 joined the school's marching band and #4 got straight A's on her report and is going strongly with her choir. #3 has imprioved at school, #2, er, hasn't, but we're working on it.

On the writing front, I made the decision late last year not to take on extra studies this year. At the time, it was because #6 child was going into pre-school and I had no idea what his schedule would be like, but I'm awfuly glad now, given the work that was Conjure - at about the time sem 1 university finals would have been held/assignments due! Hoi!

So, I decided that once Conjure was over, I would reduce the amount of stuff I'm doing in the Arts Industry itself and use the second half of the year to actually write. I believe that this involvement is actually one of my procrastination strategies - I'm literally too busy to write. So, I decided not to take on the presidency of Fantastic Queensland (presuming I would have been elected at the EGM, that is), or actually run for any committee offices at all (it helped that the EGM happened at a time I was particularly stressed out and ill, so when D called me and said, "well?", I said, "only if no-one else is available, but rather not." Someone else was - hi Ben! - so all is good. Ben Perrett should do a great job).

So, now that Clarion South apps are about done, I have no Arts Admin to do until the workshop in January. Of course, there's still running the kids around to everything, but that's unavoidable and I don't mind that.

Anyhooo... in order to kick-start me back on the BethDane project, I joined the QWC (Queensland Writer's Centre) and their "Express year of the Novel" with Louise Cusack. I've worked with Louise before at EnVision, although not on this project. I'm finding it very helpful: I'm crystallising elements of the plot that had been irking me and also am finding the love of the project again. Also, I am in the position where I have deadlines to work to - and I find that I work much better with deadlines.

Louise also did a very good mini exercise yesterday where we listed why we write, which gave me furiously to think, because I've been wondering that myself lately, as in, I really had no idea, because I didn't kinda "love" it any more, but I still think it's what I'm "supposed" to be doing.

In my case, I've always written. I've always read books, and from the time I could consider writing stories, I used to write. When I was littler, one of my favourite series of books was the Trixie Belden books (girl detective). I used to write my own girl-detective-with-a-group-of-friends in exercise books. My #2 son does the ame thing now, but with fantasy stories. I recognised the signs right away. Thing is, come Hell or high water, that's what I do. It's all I know; that I must write. And neither #2 son or I will ever be truly happy unless we're writing at some level. Publication is not as important to me... but it'd be nice (and I can't help but wonder if there isn't that "fear of success" thing happening but we addressed that subject yesterday, too).

Louise made a good point, too: not everyone can write. Not everyone has "voices in their head" and a need to write. People who do are the type of people who write, just as some people are talented at music and others at mathematics, and still others at athletics. Yet, while no-one would think twice about people who pursue maths or athletics or music as being talented in that area and feeling OK to say "I am in that club", writers tend to apologise a bit for their special talent and try to downplay it.

She's right, of course. So I'll stop doing that.

The other thing I realised is that I'd been "writing as a challenge" for so long that, now that this challenge is gone, I stopped writing because I'd been focussing incorrectly. What I mean is: for so long, I'd been writing to "prove" to a certain ex-husband that I could do it; that I wasn't wasting my time and it wasn't "just a hobby".

Thing is, at one point, the ex stopped being able to press my buttons and I no longer cared what he thought as a consequence. I still don't. This is healthy.
Unfortunately, because I'd been writing out of escapism and revenge (for lack of a better word) for so long, I'd lost my original love of it, and along with it, my ability to actually get a story from my head seamlessly, without losing interest in a project very quickly. For the last 2 years, I've been writing on and off because I thought I had to, you know, so many people had helped me with projects, I'd been saying that's what I did and I'm not a liar, sense of obligation, etc., etc., etc. Now, I'm finding that love and excitement again.... back to who I was before the damage was done. Yay.

:-)

We also went into the concept of a "scene". What is a scene, as opposed to a chapter or a narrative summary?

It works like this:

A scene:

1. Takes place in real time
2. Has a setting
3. Contains dialogue and/or action
4. Moves the story forward

"Moves the story forward" means that it creates a meaningful change in the character, either positively or negatively expressed. If your character and story are in exactly the same place as they were when the scene started, then it isn't useful for the book. Scenes can be any length, and may also be cut in the middle (as, say the end of a chapter - a "cliffhanger").

An example of "meaningful change" could be a change in circumstances, attitude or character, in a way that either creates a move forward or a setback for the story or character.

Scenes are important for characterisation.

Narrative summary:

lets the reader know what happened without dragging the reader through all of the details when:
1. nothing all that important is happening, ie "he ate breakfast" rather than, "he walked down the stairs, took the cereal out of the cupboard, put it on the table, went to sit then realised he'd forgotten the milk..." etc.
2. when you're repeating something done before, ie you may describe the first time your wizard castys a spell but it'd get boriong if you did that every time... or you may describe that first important kiss, but "he kissed her goodbye" is probably all you need after that.

"Flashbacks" can be scenic or summary-ic (hehe) but are, according to Donald Maass, deadly to a "breakout novel." (Read his book "Writing the Breakout Novel" to see why).

Create tension by: resisiting the urge to explain (fortunately, I can resist the urge to explain but often create confusion instead! Will work on that).

Use setting in an emotional context to evoke a mood. (This was explained in the same way Louise explained "atmosophere" to me a couple of years ago).

Louise also gave us an anatomy of a plot structure (a certain someone can pay attention to this and you know who you are... how was the move, btw? :-P).

This is Louise's work, btw, not my summary:

Beginning (about 25% of the book):

Introduce characters .... main chars
Critical moment .... introduce the conflict [the end of the beginning].

Middle (the middle 50% or so):

Rising Tension .... external and internal conflicts stir things up
Point of no return .... main char takes life-altering action, nothig is the same.
Crisis (climax) ....... te main char's goal appears unachieveable [the beginning of the end]

End (25% although this can be ver flexible, ie the crisis and the end often happen right on top of each other):
Resolution/denoument........ goal is achieved or lost and the aftermath

All very helpful in crystallising my book. :-)

In a series, like mine is, of course, you have a double structure going: the structure for each book (even in a run-on series, each book should have a single line that is resolved by the end of it), and the structure for the overall series.

Keeping track of them both is fun, especially since I don't really know what's happening with book 4 (the last one) yet. Exactly. I have a fair idea of where it's going though. In fact, I can't see how it can be different, although I have an "everyone's happy" ending and a "goal reached but at a price" ending which I think is less of a cop-out but may be more what the genre this book is in would be prepared to bear. We'll see.

The good news is that I already did some of this unconsciously but the trick is to do it all consciously so you're aware of what you do when you write. Without conscious awareness and acknowlegment of what you're bad at, and yes, what you're good at, too, then you can't grow or improve.

And that improve thing is kinda the point, really. Especially in my case: I'm coming into this project with it completely cold and am horrified at how awful it is!

Anyways, I have promised my "table group" at EYON that I will keep them updated on the project I'm working on so I'll post them here rather than bothering the whole group with my ramble *grin* You guys should feel free to use my comments section to do the same if you want to. :-D

This month, the homework is:

1. Split up the scene list we did for last month's homework into the sections, "beginning", "middle" and "end."
2. 2 posts to the Yahoo list.
3. Design a calendar of events.

I get to cheat a bit on the last one as I did one long before I started writing the current project, back when my name was still "Gent" and I was writing Age of Wonders fan fic Hehe. Mind you, many things have changed in the writing of it so I'll have to overhaul it (like I did my scenes list, gods that was a long process).

I have also set the following goals (this is for the fellow students to check up on me for *grin*):

1. Finish all the unfinished added/summarised stuff, in vomit-style. About 6 chapters, all up.
2. Rearrange the plot as I'd written yesterday and rewrite chapters as per notes from yesterday (about 2 chapters).
3. Start rewrite.

I am not too much of a hurry to do point 3, as 1 & 2 will probably bring up extra chapters to cut, etc. But I'm also in the process of making 1 book into 2 books while keeping the current end as the end of book one. If that makes sense.

I won't be able to do the redone scene list if I don't do 1 & 2 though. Having said that, if I manage to get to # 3, then I will also get my 10 pages to Louise in September. I should.

Believe it or not, I also have another project I want to finish: I have an agent who wants to see it. So I have a bit of a dilemma. I can work on both, I may time-table it. I will get the first draft of the timeslip project done first, then go back to this one. It's only about 80,000 words, so that'll work. I hope.

I am committed to 2 four-hour blocks of time on Thursdays and Fridays when I don't have anything else on, plus Wednesdays that #6 is at preschool. The only thing I will "allow" to be on is stuff pertaining to the kids. eg, this week, I have to take #3 on an excursion on Thursday but I will still have an hour before that. This week, the Wednesday is a write-off as the pre-school has an excursion and needs an adult:child ratio of 1:2. Friday is good though, and I have some time today & tonight as well.

I let you guys know how it's going as I go.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

I just spent

a bit of time reading over the last couple of years of my blog.

Good god, woman.

That is all.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Bananas, again

Which is more important to you and why: flexibility or expandability?

Bananas.

Yeah. Still works.

Oh. Check out this post to see what I mean.

There are a few others on the subject, too, if you feel like looking at the October 2004 Archive.

Not suggested. I was a bit of a loon back then.

Yeah. Some things never change. Ha ha. I heard that. :-P

Bananas are very expensive right now, for those of you o/s who don't know. Try between $11 and $20 a kilo. Nature's fault; the cyclones up north last summer took out all of the banana plantations.

My local grocer calls them "diamonds."

Thursday, August 03, 2006

So.

Wassssup???

I've been out of commission for a while. And a lot has happened since I was here last. So, I'm not going to bore anyone with the details. Instead, I am going to gradually re-insinuate my way back onto my own blog.

I'm also going to start writing the Siobhan Ellis blog, too. I've been waiting until I've had time to do something nice to the blogspot pro-forma, you know, html-wise, but I haven't had the time and I've pretty well decided not to make any more excuses for myself.

For any reason.

So, hi. :-)

And, for anyone who yet again thought I was dead, here is my obituary.

The link was snurched from this blog: http://thebedandbreakfastman.blogs.com/ . I stumbled onto this one fairly recently: turns out the writer is an old-friend-of-an-old-friend. Don't ask. But drop by and have a look. This fellow Australian is a funny bloke. And *only* 37, too... sorry, anyone who can make random uses of Monty Python is OK in my book. I can't yet. I'm only 35. But then, no-one expects the spanish Inquisition.





QuizGalaxy!
'What will your obituary say?' at QuizGalaxy.com


Anyone who knows me from the old LifeLine will find that terribly amusing, I'm sure.